Cross Cultural

LawAccording to the stupefy surrounded by melodic line pout and Bambang , it was Bambang who as so-called to meet the loading and insurance charges of the payloadAccording to the stupefy amidst Song Ling and Bambang , it was Bambang who was supposed to meet the despatch and insurance charges of the loading . Under the law of generate a party give notice accept a contract by conduct . He needs not to inevitably give his express adoption . An offer can be accepted either viva voce , in writing or by conduct- Even though Bambang did not expressly manoeuver his confirmation to the clause requiring that the vendee meets the freightage and insurance charges his garner proposing on the carrier to be used subsequently amounted to credenza of the terms of contract . These facts ar supported in the eccentric of Brodgen vs . Metropolitan Railway where the complainant and defendants had been trading for a prospicient period of time . At one point , the defendants placed an to the plaintiff but with various terms i .e . lesser expenditure than commonplace . As usual , the plaintiffs accepted the and supplied the goods . later(prenominal) on , Brodgen (plaintiffs ) sued on the various terms . It was held that there was word meaning by conduct by the plaintiffs supplying the goods as usual given the period of rail line relationshipHowever , there exists no contract between SEATS and Bambang everywhere anything to do with the shipment of the wine . Song ling is therefore under an liability to sue Bambang , recover the freight and storehouse charges and remit the said(prenominal) to SEATS . She cannot expect SEATS to bear this money from Bambang instanter because under the Victorian laws , a contract creates rights and obligation solely between the parties related to that contract . A cont ract does not transfer rights and obligation! s to a unusual in the contract as it was held in the case of Dunlop PreumaticTyre Co . vs . Selfridge .

In this case the plaintiff agreed with X not to consider tyres below Dunlop s price list . X were dealers in the tyres construct by the plaintiff . Further , he made some opposite apprehension that as Dunlop s agent , they were to secure similar contracts with any other party who dealt with Dunlop s tyres . X entered into such an conformity with Selfridge . besides Selfridge breached this agreement later forcing Dunlop to sue him for breach of contract held . The event was to bolt as Dunlop was a stranger to the contract between X and Selfridge Similarly , the agreement in this case regarding the freight charges was between SEATS and Sing Long , Bambang being a stranger to the agreementAnother carry out available to Song Ling is that of pitch an action of negligence against SEATS to counter their suit of find the freight charges from them . This is due to the damage that was caused to 15 ,000 cartons when being transhipped in look Moresby to MV Papal . The damage arose as topic of a fault of the slevedores PNG muscle , subcontractors for SEAT . SEAT owed Song...If you hope to subscribe to a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay